It was in an article critiquing the original report yesterday. They also pointed out the bias in recruiting volunteers on Facebook. Hardly “random”.
Why is recruiting volunteers on Facebook less random than any other form of recruiting?
I read articles evaluating the reports and suggesting where they might be wrong, but I didn’t see any saying the tests might detect other kinds of viruses. One said that the only thing the researchers found when verifying the results is that they might get false positives, not false negatives.