in an emergency some rights are restricted. That’s part of many emergencies.
Nonsense. Emergency declarations are to remove and suspend potential barriers of regulation & procedure inside governmental bodies and assets so as to provide greater flexibility and streamline the response to a crisis. There is no legal mechanism to "restrict" any rights - not even under martial law. Governmental bodies are subject to judicial review as to whether actions taken during that emergency declaration were constitutionally permissible, or not.
facts are only nonsense when you try to call them that Look up the major emergencies of the last century starting with world war 1. Look at the “facts” i posted. your objections to reality don’t make something nonsensical.
I mentioned judicial review. The preferred check and balance is in the elected legislatures as the congress did with trump then judges had too get involved despite not being given that power in the 1976 act.
The fact you acknowledge judicial review only proves my statements are true.
‘Nonsense indeed!