[Steven W.]

It’s by intent - all of these perps had separate comms & aliases. The OIG report was designed so that the actual characters (”corney”) were embedded therein but a special font was used to render as to appear as a “rn” vs. “m”.

So that was “Comey” = “Corney”

But I never noticed that in the HRC e-mails - and it’s right there. So they had different domains; of course the “.com” might contain e-mails about Yoga & Chelsea’s wedding ... but “.corn” - you see the purpose + likely intent.

TBD + WWG1WGA :)

[fatima]

[stylin19a]

I'm still missing something.

It’s by intent - all of these perps had separate comms & aliases. The OIG report was designed so that the actual characters (”corney”) were embedded therein but a special font was used to render as to appear as a “rn” vs. “m”.

ICANN turnover happened 10/01/2016. ".corn". is not listed as an ICANN domain. So how was\does an original email get modified and when?

So when was this "special font" used and how?

too many holes to get my arms around.