Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Gamgee
One early view about antiquity of humans in the Americas was about 1000 BC, with some of the (still) puzzling monumental construction attributed to a poorly-understood and poorly-articulated collection of "Old World" civs, such as the Phoenicians. The Viking presence before Columbus is now of course documented in archaeology, but their numbers were apparently too small to move the needle when looking at what passes for Native American DNA; either they didn't intermarry, which is likely, and eventually returned to Europe, or whatever genetic heritage they left vanished through luck of the draw and give or take the vanishing of entire tribes post-Great Migration (that's the relevant geographic area).
During the 1920s (if memory serves) the antiquity got a major bump backwards into time with the discovery of stone-age technology families, the oldest (then) known being Clovis (named for the place of first discovery). This was widely doubted, and not accepted until the 1950s after the radiocarbon method was discovered and verified (and somewhat increased) the age of the Clovis period.
Hidebound as the academic community is (always and everywhere), the higher date rotted into what I call Clovis-First-and-Only, a rubbish idea that humans knew nothing about boats, a weird claim to make considering the maritime hunting and fishing that goes on to this day on both sides of the Bering Strait. Also, the dates on sites like Cactus Hill and Dillehay's site in South America don't fit the CFAO narrative.

22 posted on 04/17/2020 1:05:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

I obviously have a LOT more to learn about the American ancestors that were here. Very interesting though. The whole Aztec situation I find very intriguing. It seems by their cruelty and violence they held many other native groups in their thrall. So much so that some of those groups aided Cortez in the final destruction of the Aztec society. I have heard estimates of up to 40 million could have lived in the central Mexican area.


30 posted on 04/17/2020 4:40:20 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

A whole lot of DNA R1 and I genes in the Indian tribes of North East US and Canada, usually blamed on the French. I think the Natives would have better taste.


31 posted on 04/18/2020 11:46:36 AM PDT by Little Bill (VN 65 - 68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson