Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mvonfr

-—Because first scientific study of chloroquine showed that it is not a solution-—

Chinese study, for what it’s worth. But, in the body of the study, it said that chloroquine did significantly reduce symptoms. Also, the Std. of Care that the study used as a base line is a bit vague, especially if it is the Chinese standard of care. Additionally, these were patients already hospitalized in China. It is difficult to understand their true health status.

I don’t have an opinion as to the efficacy of HCQ, but I do have an opinion regarding this study: it does not show that HCQ is not an effective treatment early on.


22 posted on 04/17/2020 6:33:11 AM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: oldplayer

Nothing, no data, from China is reliable. Should not even be cited.

We have a MOUNTAIN of empirical data right here in the US. We have politicians and movie stars cured by it and will not say a peep about it (except for that poor naive D from Georgia who is going to get hammered for having the poor sense than to be grateful to President Trump for pushing this).

If China said water was wet, I’d start from the position it wasn’t.


28 posted on 04/17/2020 6:35:31 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson