Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

There are a bunch of articles and papers online; https://jeccr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13046-019-1251-7
1 posted on 04/07/2020 8:41:31 PM PDT by McCabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: McCabe

Back in the 1980s, one my classmates was the son of a cancer researcher at MD Anderson. He gave a lecture to our biology class... and it was about the role viruses play in causing cancer. He was adamant that almost all cancers had a viral cause. I have no idea of that is true... except in the case of some ovarian cancers. But I’ll never forget that lecture.


2 posted on 04/07/2020 8:47:28 PM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

Yes...absorbed zinc is beneficial to proper cellular metabolism and would have positive effects against abnormal cell activity.


6 posted on 04/07/2020 8:59:27 PM PDT by mazz44 (http://knowledgeofhealth.com/why-animals-age-they-produce-less-vitamin-c-same-for-humans/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

I had that thought too. Went looking and posted here the other day that the world cancer rate maps match those malaria/no malaria maps almost exactly.


8 posted on 04/07/2020 9:02:00 PM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe
Q has alluded to such a possibility.

this was an odd post until I discovered the reason that it’s an odd post.

9 posted on 04/07/2020 9:03:00 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe
"Q has alluded to such a possibility"

Really?

11 posted on 04/07/2020 9:05:10 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

It has been said that if Trump provided a cure for cancer, the Fake Media would still blame him for death.


14 posted on 04/07/2020 9:09:30 PM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

bkmk


16 posted on 04/07/2020 9:17:22 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

Marking this


17 posted on 04/07/2020 9:21:29 PM PDT by The Mayor (I am outraged at your outrage toward the outrage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

You mean like cannabidiol?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579246/


18 posted on 04/07/2020 9:27:40 PM PDT by Tacrolimus1mg (Do no harm, but take no sh!t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe
There is lots of research going on into hydroxychloroquine and cancer. Medical research takes time, and the answers are often "maybe" instead of "certainly", and the "certainly" is often a "not much".

Clinical Trials Using Hydroxychloroquine.

This seems to say yes, but I don't speak PhD Cancer Researcher and can't figure out what cancers they are talking about at all. The next one is a little clearer for non-PhD's:

Effect of Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel With or Without Hydroxychloroquine on Patients With Advanced Pancreatic CancerA Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

"Meaning Hydroxychloroquine added to chemotherapy did not improve overall survival among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer."

That's a no. But then there's this:

Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO)—chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as anti-cancer agents:
"Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are well-known 4-aminoquinoline antimalarial agents. Scientific evidence also supports the use of CQ and HCQ in the treatment of cancer. Overall, preclinical studies support CQ and HCQ use in anti-cancer therapy, especially in combination with conventional anti-cancer treatments since they are able to sensitise tumour cells to a variety of drugs, potentiating the therapeutic activity. Thus far, clinical results are mostly in favour of the repurposing of CQ. However, over 30 clinical studies are still evaluating the activity of both CQ and HCQ in different cancer types and in combination with various standard treatments."

From the few words I understand, there seem to be lots of unfinished studies in progress.

The clinical value of using chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine as autophagy inhibitors in the treatment of cancers A systematic review and meta-analysis:
"Conclusion:
"This meta-analysis showed that autophagy-inhibitor-based therapy has better treatment response compared to chemotherapy or radiation therapy without inhibiting autophagy, which may provide a new strategy for the treatment of cancers."

So... another qualified yes from looking at other maybes?

My barely informed conclusion:
Lots of doctors are already looking into it. As a actual cure for any particular form of cancer, probably not. As part of treatment for some cancers, it might start seeing some use in a few years.

20 posted on 04/07/2020 9:46:52 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

7 viruses linked to cancer
https://www.mdanderson.org/publications/focused-on-health/7-viruses-that-cause-cancer.h17-1592202.html

Oncoviruses
https://www.infectiousdiseaseadvisor.com/home/advisor-channels/hepatitis-advisor/oncovirus-and-aggressive-malignancy/

The “quine’s” vs cancer
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31268153
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22878749

History of research, metabolic attacks on cancer:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23496164-tripping-over-the-truth

Sherlock Holmes of cancer metabolism on her own cancer
https://www.amazon.com/Starve-Cancer-without-starving-yourself-ebook/dp/B07B2XMLT9/


22 posted on 04/07/2020 10:12:27 PM PDT by JCL3 (As Richard Feynman might have said, this is reality taking precedence over public relations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

ALWAYS follow the money trail.
They’ve probably have known about a simple cure for decades and kept it hidden, except to treat the elites, of course. They make tons more money by treating the symptoms than providing a cure. Cancer victims are like cattle to them...to milked till there’s nothing left and let em die.
IF so, these rotten, greedy, evil SOBs should be strung up like Mussolini.


23 posted on 04/07/2020 10:59:23 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

The enemedia wants to downplay it; they don’t want too many people recovering this long before the election.


24 posted on 04/07/2020 11:23:30 PM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

I remember several years ago when a family member had a cancer scare, I was spending hours upon hours trying to find anything that may help. I read an old research paper (several actually) that showed cancer to be viral based and how at a certain level of zinc in the body, cancer cells can’t spread. So maybe cancer may benefit from the 2 just like this virus.


25 posted on 04/07/2020 11:37:18 PM PDT by terart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McCabe

We already know that this ‘game’ is being played on Diabetics, where they’re told that Diabetes is a life sentence and the ONLY OPTION is to take more and more drugs and insulin, until your body starts rotting out. To put it another way - a HUGE gravy train for the medical/nutritional/drug community.

So one can easily understand the negative reaction of that community to the now-proven alternative to the above, which is the Keto Diet.


27 posted on 04/08/2020 4:35:47 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson