REX @REX@social.quodverum.com
1. OK I wouldn’t normally do this but given the DMs and also emails, let me say a few words about....
Q.
Saul @Debradelai is not going to be amused but if I may ask his genius to indulge me, that would be much appreciated.
Also I’d like my thoughts to be shared on twitter with Praying Medic (great guy), X22 (amazing), RedPillNews and Methods.
Plus my old buddy Joe Mascapoe.
Here goes.
2. Most of you would know that I’m a Q agnostic.
My view is that Q can’t be some lameass troll. By now the effort required would be too much for a troll, or even a team of trolls.
I’m pretty confident it’s a pro-Trump team. Apart from that it’s hard to work out how close they are to Trump’s inner circle.
Anyway.
3. All I want to do here is to open up new thinking on Q. Assuming the mighty Q army is correct, my hope is that my thoughts may end up getting Q observers to connect new dots.
So, here goes.
4. Thing is, I used to be quite gifted at math.
As well as ancient history, especially Greek and Roman.
So here’s the thing. The ancients discovered something we call ‘the golden ratio’, or ‘Phi’.
The number - 1.618 =~ 1.7) has always been considered a godlike number.
Here’s the ancient symbol for ‘Phi’.
5. It is a godlike number because it defines human explanation.
It’s an irrational number with terms that go on forever after the decimal point, without repeating.
And yet it is also the basis for multiple examples of human genius. In short, it’s fascinating.
And VERY Trumpian.
http://mathcentral.uregina.ca/beyond/articles/Art/DaVinci.html
6. I’m not going to try and apply it to Q.
I’m too lazy, for starters.
BUT if I was I’d start with this sequence
10, 17, 28. Why?
The first Q tweet was 10/28/17, I believe.
So, 10+17+ (1) = 28.
Observe - the NEXT number in the sequence must be :
28 + 17 + (1) = 46.
Then, 46 + 28 + (1) = 75.
Right?
7. And so forth.
That’s all I have.
Q folk can search for any meaning that may exist.
Do you use the original Q post as A in the alphabet? If you use Q’s first post date and project ahead, does a pattern emerge?
Bear in mind - Q may in fact be the ancient letter for the golden ratio. And that find may be extremely significant.
Maybe. Over to you, Q people.
I hope that this opens up new thinking. I have no answers.
Please do let me know.
#MAGA
The end.
https://social.quodverum.com/@REX
10/28/16 no?
That is very interesting by Rex ... I see what he’s doing with the pattern but I don’t yet see where it goes beyond what’s there to start with. Most significantly it has Rex, a self described “agnostic” on “Q” going back to “Q”.
Direct link to the Rex thread on Q:
https://social.quodverum.com/@REX/103940526542068870