Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

She is after money.

She aborted the kid without evidence that the surgery would have harmed him. Now, if she had an ultrasound that showed abnormalities she would have a case.

But if she had shown high gonadotropins, the docs should have postponed elective surgery... it sounds like she may have been only 1or 2 weeks pregnant...

But not enough details to judge


3 posted on 04/03/2020 10:13:19 PM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LadyDoc

General anesthesia really needs to be monitored closely when administered to someone who is pregnant; and it had better be necessary. I wager she probably was handled like any other patient.

She did, ultimately, consent to surgery. It’s possible that she was told it’s no big deal, and went ahead thinking there should be no problems. However, I’m sure we don’t have all of the details. She was still in her first or two month of her first trimester, and it’s hard to get quality ultrasounds that early in.

Being familiar with Alexian, I can tell you that their track record isn’t the best


5 posted on 04/03/2020 10:28:53 PM PDT by Tacrolimus1mg (Do no harm, but take no sh!t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson