I think you’ll have to compare Muller’s published philosophy with that of the Lucis Trust to make the connection that he is openly Luciferian - I haven’t found any specific comment by him where he clearly states he is Lucifierian. He is also strongly associated with educating children in Luciferian principles culminating with Common Core here in the US. Some things you have to look at the body of content to make these conclusions and I think this one is pretty solid, indeed more so than a lot of the assertions we make. ;)
I think youll have to compare Mullers published philosophy with that of the Lucis Trust to make the connection that he is openly Luciferian - I havent found any specific comment by him where he clearly states he is Lucifierian. He is also strongly associated with educating children in Luciferian principles culminating with Common Core here in the US. Some things you have to look at the body of content to make these conclusions and I think this one is pretty solid, indeed more so than a lot of the assertions we make. ;)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you for the explanation. I have my eye on those new to the thread, visiting to see what we post and some, like me, would find it helpful if “self-professed” could be instead, “strongly associated” or perhaps, “author so and so claims...” on those occasions where no source is known.
I know we drift off the preserve - it’s not rare; but I hope we can keep returning to it and put forth the evidence or qualifying statements to otherwise help peeps understand the basis of what’s on the thread. Again, thank you for the explanation. :D