Posted on 03/25/2020 9:23:43 AM PDT by kiryandil
Scott Adams blows up The System. He explains that celebrities get the hydroxychloroquine/Z-Pak regimen upon demand, and tells the peasants how to get it if they need it.
Key points:
1. A Covid test is $1000, and you wait five days while drowning in your own snot.
2. The hydroxychloroquine/Z-Pak regimen is $20-$50, you may get a case of diarrhea, and the regimen is five days long.
Episode 871 Scott Adams: It's Time to Stop Using an Obama Afghanistan Strategy Against a Virus
https://youtu.be/axDxEeanems?t=1035
Lots of the F-word. Scott is MAD, and he's putting the beatdown on the Elites.
"You gotta bring down the control to the doctor and the patient, and I'm gonna tell you how" starts at https://youtu.be/axDxEeanems?t=1205
So you agree that if treating this virus with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin has a 100% cure rate, that’s a good outcome?
It would be interesting to track the supply of Hydroxychloroquine within Nevada to determine if the stocks are moving, regardless of the prescription usage. Is it being funneled to a state government reserve or dispersed within the state government hierarchy?
I called you no names but you have convinced me.
Hell yes. I have been saying all along, if we know it works use it. We don’t. There is a way we could know it in milliseconds. For some reason who ever does know ain’t talking. They need to start. Now. If I had access to a computer and their database I could publish an article in a half hour that would make the case one way or the other. Fairly definitively. Knowing that makes me wonder why that article is not being widely distributed.
I hope so. Thank you. So I have reached one person. Makes it all worthwhile. I could kiss you.
I was right. You haven't been paying attention. At all.
Yours is a RIDICULOUS statement.
Not many are familiar with Difluorodiphenyltrichloroethane or DFDT, which the German army favored over DDT. It killed insects four times as swiftly with a smaller application; and, did not provide survival rates which would allow development of resistance to this insecticide.
Would you care to enlighten me so I can do better next time?
But you’re lying.
About what. By the way I just noticed a journalist, Rosie McCall has just published an article (that I can’t access yet) but the headline is “HCQ works no better than conventional therapy”. She has an email address. You can share your thoughts with her, too. I think I will wait until I can actually read the article to see what it’s all about.
You’re lying when you say hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin doesn’t work against coronavirus.
“Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intubations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3827770/posts?page=13#13
You are referencing a published email that professes 100% cure in 5 days with no follow up. There is a reason he published an email. No reputable Journal would look twice at this.
The meta-narrative here is the following:
When it’s shown that Trump was right and Dr. Fauci was wrong about treatment for COVID-19, the outcome will be extreme winning for Trump.
This is what the controversy is about. Trump’s enemies don’t want hi to win. Very sad!
Hmmmm interesting
I think you may be seeing conspiracies that just aren’t there. Not to say the Rats aren’t doing all kinds of things (we both know, they are) but so far I have not seen any lying from the team. I have wondered why we don’t know about the “deaths with/without Plaquenil” and even implied some neglect. Who knows? Maybe I was the first one to ask the question? Maybe the answer is confusing and the data doesn’t answer the question (which I doubt, but-never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence).
How hard is it for “reputable journals” to rid themselves of their ties to big pharma and big medicine?
Dr. Fauci’s obsession with formalized clinical trials while essentially denying the real potential of this treatment demonstrates the intellectual limitations inflicted on doctors by a system designed to favor special interests over medical outcomes.
What is the dosage rate each for treatment of Malaria, Lupus, and Rheumatism? Is there a single weekly dose for prevention of Malaria or a daily dose? What dosage rate for the off-label afflictions. What is the short term safe dosage rates to clear an active Malarial infection? What dosage threshold initiates cardiac Q-T interval changes as a side effect?
regarding drug rationing, buddy carter interview coming up soon on fox business
Millions of people have been taking this medication for decades. The known side effects are mostly nausea and diarrhea.
Why are you so intent on portraying nausea and diarrhea as somehow worse than agonizing death by asphyxiation?
I’m sorry to break your bubble. I really am. I have seen this sort of behavior before. When I was a Resident we even had a name for it. “Brucelize”. There was a practice that did all kinds of stuff. Send patients stuff like this email so they could tell each other “this guy is the greatest doctor in the world.” In reality all three of them were hacks none of us admired. We used to call them the “Three Stooges”. I know. This is inside baseball and I never mentioned it to any of my actual patients. They were great examples of “What not to be.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.