Yeah, very fair point.
IDK.
What I see is docs thinking the awful testing is the cause for the “re-exposure” reports.
Haven’t seen solid data.
Tucker made some great CV points, on his show, tonight.
One that really stood out....
We’re not getting any good, actual data (like detailed info about cases) to be able to determine where this thing is going, and for how long.
Like it’s a moving target that you can know too much info about.
Same with the immunity question. And, the surface longevity...and the shedding/infection capability timeframe.