Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
***There were two walls, with the more northerly abandoned due to there being nothing much of value between there and the line of what became Hadrian's Wall***

My comment was a bit off-handed; but your reply may be a more pithy reason for Hadrian's Wall than troublesome rebels... there was nothing much of value above Hadrian's Wall. Like Arthur's Avalon - just separate the Picts from the real {Roman} world. :^D

Of course the Roman garrisons stationed on Hadrian's Wall may contradict that view.

48 posted on 03/22/2020 1:46:45 PM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Bob Ireland
The Roman army in Britain was often pretty thin, because it was such a quiet province, and the Wall made the frontier easy to guard and made commerce simple to control. Much of the length of the wall is atop natural ridges and other commanding landscape features. Most of the purpose was probably analogous to the British Empire's Great Hedge in India, which was control of commerce. There were at least three other Roman wall systems to define and/or control frontiers -- the limes system in Germany, the long barrier that crosses the landscape a good bit east of Israel, and at least one wall system in northern Africa.

50 posted on 03/22/2020 2:10:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson