Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

All kidding aside, this is clickbait. A star cannot be teardrop shaped. They said oh it is weird and shaped like a teardrop all you stupid people who don’t know crap about astrophysics. Then they say oh it really is a binary star system with one of the two stars being a pulsar. The pulsar pulsates in all directions on its equatorial plane while the companion star eclipses it regularly as they orbit each other. The smaller star is probably a neutron star and is probably more massive because neutron stars are the pulsars and are smaller and more dense because they have more mass. That explains why the larger star can eclipse the smaller pulsar and the fuzzy image in the telescope looks like a teardrop because you can not focus at that distance.

Why it took 40 years to find one? Because they don’t last very long. That neutron star is going to consume the larger companion star probably in less than 10,000 years.


11 posted on 03/13/2020 11:15:21 PM PDT by webheart (L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: webheart

The article says the companion star is a red dwarf. But yes it’s probably a very short-lived scenario, if a few million years can be considered short-lived.


15 posted on 03/14/2020 12:16:42 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson