Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LouieFisk
-- That has been the experience so far, those are the averages. --

There is no way to know 20% of COVID infectees require hospitalization until we know the number of infectees. The figure you are using is a fraction of people with serious enough symptoms to go to the doctor - and no doubt some of those people go to the doctor on minor symptoms.

-- but most of our lives are shaped by speculation. How many eggs to get for next week --

Or when to buy toilet paper. All those decisions are based on experience. We have a fair handle on repeat/predicablt events. What is the household rate of egg consumption? Milk? How much gasoline do you consume in a month? How far is your commute and how many days a year do you go to work? Sure, there is some uncertaintly there, but not much.

How much uncertainty is there in "20% of people who become infected with COVID will require hospitalization"?

20 posted on 03/13/2020 3:13:31 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

“There is no way to know 20% of COVID infectees require hospitalization until we know the number of infectees.”
—
Those are confirmed cases, And as you noted, we have no way of knowing how many people aren’t infected. That’s getting into a “proving a negative” type of area.

“How much uncertainty is there in “20% of people who become infected with COVID will require hospitalization”?”
—
I imagine you can just use “of all confirmed cases”, if you prefer, to be more semantically accurate. Doesn’t change the numbers, tho. ::shrug::


23 posted on 03/13/2020 3:20:51 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson