[SeekAndFind]

RE: I thought this would be interesting, if accurate. In addition, with a total of 1,290 cases and the population for Fifty states + D.C. being 328,239,523, then is an infection rate of 0.000393 correct?

Yes, but you cannot assume that all the table column numbers will be static like the first two columns.

The third column will be INCREASING in number for each row as more testing continues. Hence, the numbers in the fourth row will be increasing too.

[daniel1212]

RE: I thought this would be interesting, if accurate. In addition, with a total of 1,290 cases and the population for Fifty states + D.C. being 328,239,523, then is an infection rate of 0.000393 correct? Yes, but you cannot assume that all the table column numbers will be static like the first two columns. The third column will be INCREASING in number for each row as more testing continues. Hence, the numbers in the fourth row will be increasing too.

Yes, but I am dealing with the present data.

[Fledermaus]

Bullshit. It’s not going to increase much.