It’s not “rubbish” or “garbage numbers”, it’s MATH. More importantly, it’s THE # the WHO is using. I’m not making up the number.
Per https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ the # dead so far globally is 3,569. # confirmed infected is 105,956.
3,569 / 105,956 = 3.3673%, or ~3.4%.
It’s not helpful to claim things are “garbage numbers” when the independent, objective data says otherwise.
>”It’s not “rubbish” or “garbage numbers”, it’s MATH.”
Math doesn’t require lying with statistics
>”More importantly, it’s THE # the WHO is using. I’m not making up the number.”
You’re not making up the number, your misrepresenting what it means and grossly misapplying it to create wildly hallucinatory estimates
>”Per https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ the # dead so far globally is 3,569. # confirmed infected is 105,956.”
Right... Confirmed infected. Just simple math right?
Huge numbers of infected people are not counted as “confirmed cases”, rendering your death estimate as... garbage.
>”It’s not helpful to claim things are “garbage numbers” when the independent, objective data says otherwise.”
When you misapply statistics, it renders your conclusions garbage