Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BobL

IDK.
Seems that air is intended for other purposes and would be very expensive to divert.
But I appreciate that you’ve thought the idea through.


1,639 posted on 03/07/2020 6:45:43 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1633 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith

“Seems that air is intended for other purposes and would be very expensive to divert. But I appreciate that you’ve thought the idea through.”

Thanks. However, I don’t think it’s very expensive, but there is a marginal cost. The thing is, a year from now, the airlines, all of them, will be lucky to be flying half of their planes. So trying to squeeze the last few percent out of them for operational cost will be a very minor factor relative to getting people to again accept being cooped up with hundreds of strangers for hours at a time.

It is going to be a HUGE EFFORT to get people to travel by air again...people weren’t so hot on it even before Coronavirus. In fact, it’s not a bad marketing tool to promise fresh air, if the airlines think about it (and it’s not just regarding viruses, it’s overall air quality).

(and remember, fuel costs are only about 20%, so even a 10% fuel hit is only about a 2% hit to overall operational cost)


1,653 posted on 03/07/2020 6:56:31 PM PST by BobL (If some people here don't want to prep for Coronavirus, they can explain it to their families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1639 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson