Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BobL

Nah.
Outside air is much thinner than we need. Using it would be VERY expensive!

I think a ‘hot box’ heating system would be the thing.
But I still can’t find info on brief high-temp effects on covid.
Though it’s known to prefer cold.


1,556 posted on 03/07/2020 5:34:34 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1431 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith

“Outside air is much thinner than we need. Using it would be VERY expensive!”

Actually, the air gets compressed by the engines, and then some of it is diverted to the air conditioning/pressurization systems (called ‘bleed air’). It is both hot and compressed...but it is air meant for combustion (and thrust), so there is a fuel consumption hit - maybe 5% of simply recirculating air (but I don’t know for sure).

It is doable...and should be considered, since airlines will soon be fighting for their survival.


1,633 posted on 03/07/2020 6:37:35 PM PST by BobL (If some people here don't want to prep for Coronavirus, they can explain it to their families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1556 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson