Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

“This thread (and others) has great info. It also has complete speculation and drivel like 10%”

Of course the fatality rate can’t include the sick, only the dead or the recovered. And if you go to the BNO site right now, you’ll see 217 as “Recovered” and 27 dead, outside of China. So the 10% fatality rate seems about right...albeit with a small number of cases, so far.

https://bnonews.com/index.php/2020/02/the-latest-coronavirus-cases/

And keep in mind that most of the recovered are still receiving decent or better medical care. What if that doesn’t continue (which it won’t, simply due to our drug supply now being cut off from China)? My guess is that 10% will wind up being on the low end.


209 posted on 02/23/2020 6:34:04 PM PST by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: BobL
And if you go to the BNO site right now, you’ll see 217 as “Recovered” and 27 dead, outside of China

It takes longer to recover than to die.

My guess is that 10% will wind up being on the low end.

My guess is Chinese estimates of cases are an order of magnitude or more too low. I also presume they are misdiagnosing or hiding fatalities but not to the same extent. Hiding fatalities is much harder than ignoring cases. That means the rate is probably lower than 2% but I'd go with 2 until we get better info from outside of China.

404 posted on 02/24/2020 5:08:43 AM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways to Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson