Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gcparent
Its because if Diana that she didnt take away MM’s HRH title. At 93, queen doesnt deserve what these two are doing and writing.

I think that as long as Sparkles and Harry remain married, the Queen can't take the HRH away from one and not the other. The Crown wants to leave the door open for Harry to return and resume his position in case Mrz Thing drops him like she dropped her ex and her father. If Harry renounces his title, he would have to bow to his cousins, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, the daughters of Prince Andrew, and presumably to Kate and William and their children.

One of the things that cheesed Meghan off was having to curtsy to Kate, Beatrice and Eugenie. Even Kate has to curtsy to Bea and Eugenie, since they are blood princesses and she is not. So you can imagine how final the break would be if their titles were stripped and Meghan would have to curtsy to people she believes are not nearly as woke as she is, if they came back to UK even to visit.

As it was, she was trying to elbow in front of Kate on the balcony where the Royal family gathers to wave to the people at official events and got chastised for it. Many of Meghan's fans posting on Daily Mail seem to believe that Harry is next after Charles if people want him more than William, or that becoming the Sovereign is a popularity competition or electoral contest. One post I saw this morning opined that William and Kate should "realize" that people want Meghan and Harry more than William and Kate; ergo Meghan should be the next Queen.

Not all the idiots posting this type of drivel are Americans, either; some are from UK. As with today's American youth, apparently UK youth don't know their own history and Order of Succession, which at present is Charles, then his son William, then William's children George, Charlotte and Louis, and then Harry in the highly unlikely event that William and all three of William's children predecease Harry—unless time has passed and William's children have children of their own, which would put them ahead of Harry even if they are minors (a Regent would be appointed until the heir is of age).

In other words, never gonna be king except in the event of a regicide against the entire family. The danger of which I am not discounting. This entire situation is very dangerous for world security, since the Obamas, Oprah and the globalists behind them are "handling" Woke and Joke.

204 posted on 02/22/2020 7:57:55 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Party that freed sIaves, passed Civil Rights is called racist by the party that started the KKK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: Albion Wilde
"In other words, never gonna be king except in the event of a regicide against the entire family."

Or a royal family potrait on a rainy day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqhZiDux9y8

219 posted on 02/23/2020 5:52:31 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson