Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Article I. All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness. 1790 Constitution of the State of Massachusetts.

Notice, there is no comma after the word equal that exempts negro slaves. My guess is that the Presiding Judge interpreted the Massachusetts Constitution exactly as the wording implied. Do you have a different interpretation of the words “ All men are born free and equal”. If so, would really like to hear your interpretation of that phrase.


239 posted on 03/08/2020 5:32:38 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Snipe
Notice, there is no comma after the word equal that exempts negro slaves.

No, there isn't, and this is the flimsy structure on what this deliberate misleading of the law is built upon.

Anyone who believes that this language was intended to apply to slaves when it was written is lying to themselves. It is little different from declaring a transgender man to be a "woman", and then demand they get the privileges that a woman would get because they are a "woman."

Slaves were not equal in the understanding of that era and an attempt to claim the borrowed words from Thomas Jefferson created abolition in the state of Massachusetts is a lie.

That is not what the meaning was when that was written into the Massachusetts constitution. It was an after the fact effort to read into the words something that was never intended by the authors or those who approved the document.

My guess is that the Presiding Judge interpreted the Massachusetts Constitution exactly as the wording implied.

He interpreted it contrary to the intent of the framers by using a sophist tactic of wringing out the meaning he wanted out of the words, and deliberately ignoring the intent.

Yes, it's a noble idea to see things that way, but that is factually not the way the people of Massachusetts intended the words to be understood when they approved the Constitution. If it were so, it would have been called out to abolish slavery during the approval process.

247 posted on 03/09/2020 10:37:09 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty."/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

To: Bull Snipe; DiogenesLamp
Article I. All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness. 1790 Constitution of the State of Massachusetts.

The quote is correct, but that is the 1780 Constitution of Massachusetts, framed at a convention which met at Boston, September 1, 1779.

264 posted on 03/10/2020 11:21:07 AM PDT by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson