Replies

I agree with your baphomet ‘rant’. They’ve been flaunting this before us for years in Hollywired, methinks. Square jaws and straight figures on women. Note how they how themselves askew, to hide the lack of hips. Wide shoulders with thick forearms; they attempt to hide with poses.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LONG post -more about portrayal of trans women in advertising.

I remember square jaws used to be rare on hollywood “stars” but now they are far more common. I do know real women with defined jaws, so it’s not that that trait in and of itself is unattractive. I have wondered if women are being conditioned to admire as “beautiful” models/actresses with square jaws without realizing positive memories of men are drawing them to an otherewise masculine trait. I used to wear a fragrance called “KL” that some found too masculine - I wondered then if I basically liked it because it reminded me a little of men. Just a little though - I still love the scent of Old Spice but couldn’t wear it myself; I just like the scent because it reminds me of men.

There’s also a masculine defined wedge shaped jaw on men (not all men square jawed) that stands out a masculine extreme (many variations but the two extremes are squared and wedge). The wedge - the brow being very large and then the jaw sharpening to a point; one trans NWO reseacher described it as “The Joker”; it’s a masculine face without roundness, softness of women. The picture she showed was appealingly masculine; a man with those strong features laughing hard (pleasingly masculine and not “pretty”)

I do remember years ago when Hollywood and modeling advertising etc. shoved our society pretty hard toward “women” by claiming to empower women, reducing the focus on the “standard of beauty” which they themselves created in the first place. They showed “women” with heavy brows not plucked or shaped, thin lips etc. Women dont’ need to pluck their brows or insert silicone in their lips to look feminine (it’s the overall package that does that) so this went over well with the public tired of impossible or heavily made up beauty standards.

But now I think they were always as driven to idolize impossible, fake standards - they were just preparing us to accept trans women by elevating “differentness” so that if you saw a masculine looking model, you could reason, well, Aunt Helen does have a square jaw too and she’s adorable!” You must “let” advertisers keep you thinking only classically feminine looking women are attractive you know!

Around that time, women’s magazines featured a few women’s advocates telling readers things like, “You don’t understand, today’s models represent the appearance of less than 1% of American women! You can’t buy make up to look like they do - they are exotic, rare!” What they didn’t say, is these aren’t actually women.

There were also eye opening videos created utilizing real women models to show how Photoshop can exaggerate and reduce features to where the start and finish picture do not look like the same person. Large eyes are believed to be an instual signal to draw a desire to protect in men and women (infants have large eyes, as so many baby animals). Those videos made a positive impression on women re real life expectations, and at the same time opened the door to accepting “new” standards of beauty that would encompass male “women”.

Here’s one of those videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhCn0jf46U

Apparently, men’s eyes are naturally larger, so that helps trans “women”, but they require alot of work to reduce the deep set, heavy browed look (surgery and makeup). That’s why a common eyebrow style arches unnaturally high in advertising and on celebrities.

Trans “women” can’t have eyebrows that trace or approximately the natural brow bone because it looks too masculine. So trans “women” draw eye brows up and over the brow ridge (make the viewers eye follow the drawn arch, not the natural brows growing along the heavy brow bone). Since this became prevalent in advertising, many real women adopted this unnaturally arched design even though it doesn’t look right one the softer brow of a genetic females.

Women becoming characterless of themselves, pushing for body fat ratios seen in advertising but not on real women, lament that their hips don’t look like any of the popular models, they lost their “pre baby” figure unlike all those movie stars and models etc.

Makeup advertising drove the push for large-eyed makeup. But between photoshopping of real women to make their eyes appear up to 20% larger (and necks much longer), and employing trans “women” in advertising; real women and men are constantly exposed to advertisements featuring “women”/women with eyes larger than those found in the real world. Both sexes become indoctrinated to find real women less interesting to look at then advertised women.

Creating desire for “men” who aren’t men, “women” who aren’t women, and physical standards that don’t exist (i.e., rippling abs on women and for that matter, men!). Women staying home to raise families made to feel like “professional failures” etc. Natural men being portrayed as unfeeling, narcissistic aggressive brutes. What would life be without the perversion of the Satanists?