[hoosiermama]

https://twitter.com/techno_fog/status/1227817454178590720?s=21P

On that Roger Stone juror -

Of the utmost importance will be her responses to these juror questions on:

(1) Social media and the Mueller investigation

(2) Running for office

If she answered in the negative... things will get interesting.

kudos @Cernovich

[STARLIT]

This is from Peobody's post...tks.

Comment..........Funding4capital

They should not request a retrial.they need to motion the judge recuse herself over this. they need to request that the gov ceast and desist on this trial and dismiss its case against him as they have broken about 30 laws getting to this point including lying on a fisa warrant.

Cathy Martin...This retweet about Stone directly is pretty incredible.

It is becoming increasingly clear that the judicial system in DC is rigged. A partisan activist judge, a rabid prosecutor and a rubber stamp jury.

Just the way is was initially planned. Notice the last minute moves and countermoves by Obama and Trump regarding DOJ from pre-inauguration to mid 2017?

She said all trump supporters are racists & Roger supported Trump.

And she still hasn't taken her account down:

She got there with the complicity of the judge. That's why she sealed it in the first place.

This is Fukcin crazy! Why was this juror not discharged immediately! 🙄This person should have never been on the jury, she had inherent bias, just by her social media posts. From what I read it’s was more than just her!

Hmmm ut-oh someone might be in trouble.

If she answered in the affirmative, things SHOULD get interesting for the activist judge.Stone's lawyers uncovered this evidence and requested new trial but the judge denied the request and sealed the motion, threatened punishment if revealed.

During jury selection? Or Feb 5th, well after the verdicts?

Why does the “when” matter? The fact that it’s come out means there is an issue with the trial and the conviction. Either retrial or acquittal.