Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: blueplum

This is kind of where we see how well developed and tested our plans are. For example, a 777 aircraft designed to hold 350 people can EASILY hold twice that many, if we’re serious about evacuating the people, rather than making sure we comply with every FAA regulation.

To get to that higher number, you simply prohibit checked bags, no galleys/meals (just water), limited fuel (stop in Alaska), and consider removing seats...people sit on the floor. Or, if you do keep the seats, people sit in the aisles and stand/sit in other areas. The odds of a needing a fast evacuation of a properly functioning aircraft are maybe 1 on 10000...so sometimes it pays to play the odds.

The TEST is whether people whose job it is really THINK about their options, or are they Biden Jr type patronage jobs, for which they are totally unqualified.

We shall see which.


150 posted on 01/27/2020 6:47:12 PM PST by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: BobL

first flight is supposed to be diplomats/staff and then the high risk/patients. Hopefully we can get two or three more in there for the 700 or so remaining. But it’s all relying on having ground crew avail to refuel and coordinating with the other half dozen nations trying to fly their ppl out, too. China has alternately ok’d and denied. We’re back to ok for now I guess. Sure hope it doesn’t turn into Saigon.


275 posted on 01/27/2020 8:47:33 PM PST by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson