The writer must be sampling that evil weed and lost quite a few badly needed I.Q. points.
>>The writer must be sampling that evil weed and lost quite a few badly needed I.Q. points.
Something is certainly wrong. I saw one previous article of hers that sat me down hard because I consider her a goto writer and it was, in my opinion, poor. Here, I can’t understand the basics of what she’s trying to say. But some instinct says she’s passionate about SOMETHING and I should figure it out.