The Dims were desperate to get Bolton to testify.
They are digging a hole so deep they will need ladders to get out of it.
@Barnes_Law
· 28s
Nadler is now using tweets by @DonaldJTrumpJr claiming it is evidence of a secret conspiracy. How can public tweets be part of a secret conspiracy? #ImpeachmentSham
.@RepAdamSchiff spent his opening arguments trying to relitigate the fake “Russia collusion” narrative.
Never forget that Adam Schiff supposedly had “more than circumstantial evidence” of collusion.
He misled the American people then, he’s misleading them now.— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) January 22, 2020
Adam Schiff keeps repeating statements from people like Gordon Sondland and George Kent who admit they either based their testimony on 3rd and 4th hand accounts, or had zero knowledge at all.
Someone needs to remind Schiff: a few assumptions put together does NOT = a fact— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) January 22, 2020
A reminder of what this is all about: any president -- any administration -- is justified in investigating corruption.
And there was serious evidence of real corruption concerning Hunter Biden on the board of Burisma.— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) January 22, 2020
I feel like I'm in a nightmare...
2+ hours straight of Angry Adam Schiff only to be followed by who knows how many hours of Jerry Nadler???
This is the All Star lineup for Democrats? Yikes!— Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) January 22, 2020
Do you think that Adam Schiff even believes his #BullSchiff after lying to the American public for 3 years?
It’s still Russia Russia Russia. 🙄— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) January 22, 2020
Pro tip:
Best not to frame your remarks as "narrative" or a "story" if you want your statements to be taken seriously.
At least Democrats are being slightly honest about the weight of their monologues. pic.twitter.com/Tiaa1kpW0n— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) January 22, 2020