Ryan Fournier
@RyanAFournier
·
6m
Where is Eric Ciaramella?
Rand Paul is 100% right.
The American people deserve to know if there was a conspiracy between Ciaramella and Democrat staffers to impeach President Trump before any formal articles were launched.
Adam Schiff has questions to answer, under oath.
Ryan Fournier
@RyanAFournier
·
1m
Also, why is it a problem for Rand Paul to mention Eric Ciaramella,
When apparently no one knows if he is the “whistleblower” or not?
They’re lying. The Democrats know the whistleblower, and the they had contact with him.
The Pubbies ought to just bring up Ciaramella as a solid connection..via his contact /previous meetings (in 0s WH), with Ukraine.
What have they got to lose, by doing this?
No one ‘knows’ who WB is, so they couldn’t be exposing a WB.
Bill Mitchell
@mitchellvii
·
57s
Adam Schiff is arguing that more witnesses and documents must be heard and seen for a “fair trial!”
Yet, the two most important witnesses of all, the whistleblower and the IG must NOT be heard from and their testimonies must NOT be seen.
The speech or Debate clause, Article I section6 of the Constitution, protects members of Congress from civil or criminal prosecution for lying in Either house of Congress. Does it really mean that they can lie without any consequence?