I sure would like to know how Rand framed his questio.
Was it naming the supposed WB just to get his name in the record?
If that’s the case your question wouldn’t have the same effect.
“Justice Roberts blocks Sen. Paul from naming whistleblower, source says and Paul may force the issue”
... The Federalist co-founder Sean Davis condemned what he called Roberts’ “arbitrary and unilateral censorship of senators and Senate business,” and reported that Roberts had initially sought to block even general questions of the intelligence community whistleblower. When Republicans threatened a vote rebuking Roberts on the record, Davis reported, Roberts backed down and decided only to prohibit mentioning the whistleblower’s name.
“I don’t want to have to stand up to try and fight for recognition,” Paul shouted, according to reporter Niels Lesniewski, who noted that Paul’s complaint was “audible from the galleries above the chamber.”
“If I have to fight for recognition, I will,” Paul said.
Asked by Fox News whether Paul, who has long raised concerns about possible intelligence community overreach, would press the issue during the upcoming question period, a spokesman for the senator told Fox News only, “tbd” — short for “to be determined.” Last year, Paul was vocal about wanting testimony from the whistleblower on the record.
@RaheemKassam
· 8h
Welcoming Trump's Peace Plan:
✅ Israel 🇮🇱
✅ USA 🇺🇸
✅ Egypt 🇪🇬
✅ Saudi 🇸🇦
✅ Qatar 🇶🇦
✅ Bahrain 🇧🇭
✅ UAE 🇦🇪
✅ Morocco 🇲🇦
✅ UK 🇬🇧
✅ Australia 🇦🇺
✅ + 🇮🇳🇫🇷 🇮🇹 🇧🇷 🇨🇴 🇵🇱 🇦🇹
Rejecting:
❌ Palestinians 🇵🇸
❌ Iran 🇮🇷
❌ Turkey 🇹🇷 ❌
Democratic Party 🤡
You go Rand!