@LisaMei62
· 2m
Replying to @LisaMei62
9. WSJ piece re: FISC judge > no predicate for at least 2 of 4 FISAs on Carter Page.
https://wsj.com/articles/justice-department-believes-it-lacked-legal-basis-for-continued-surveillance-of-trump-adviser-11579810061 Federalist piece w/o paywall: https://thefederalist.com/2020/01/23/breaking-spy-court-admits-fisa-warrants-against-carter-page-were-not-valid/ Will need to correct when truth comes out that ALL FISAs used to spy on Trump campaign via hops weren't legal.
We all knew this already HOWEVER why in the hell did they put a corrupt wolf to correct the corrupt hen house!!! The guy they put in charge of investigating AND correcting this IS as corrupt as they are!!! There is NO ONE in DC that is trustworthy NO ONE!!! Maybe 5 people Trump, and possibly 4 house members THATS IT!!!
In Drop #3789, Q adds a link to the source document to article in #3788:
3789
Link to Source Doc from Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC)
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
23 Jan 2020 - 4:09:35 PM
Justice Department Believes It Should Have Ended Surveillance of Trump Adviser Earlier
3788
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
23 Jan 2020 - 4:05:48 PM
https://www.wsj.com/articles/justice-department-believes-it-lacked-legal-basis-for-continued-surveillance-of-trump-adviser-11579810061?
Correction will be needed: ALL SURV re: POTUS [hops] will be concluded that there was insufficient predication to establish probable cause.”
Q
>>7889726
Article lacking source doc.
https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/FISC%20Declassifed%20Order%2016-1182%2017-52%2017-375%2017-679%20%20200123.pdf
Q