3765
Q!!Hs1Jq13jV628 Dec 2019 - 10:27:33 AM
Q!!Hs1Jq13jV628 Dec 2019 - 10:27:33 AM
Anonymous28 Dec 2019 - 10:25:40 AM
F98ECAA1-9D45-47CB-8DA9-C3C7BF6AC0B9.jpeg
>>7643842
Future will prove past!
EM2aC-YVAAAbhMq.jpg-large.jpg
>>7643883
Anonymous28 Dec 2019 - 10:25:40 AM
F98ECAA1-9D45-47CB-8DA9-C3C7BF6AC0B9.jpeg
>>7643842
Future will prove past!
EM2aC-YVAAAbhMq.jpg-large.jpg
Anonymous28 Dec 2019 - 10:28:43 AM
Screen Shot 2019-12-28 at 19.28.12.png
>>7643842
orensicator’s first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rate—the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.
These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed. Compounding this contradiction, Guccifer claimed to have run his hack from Romania, which, for numerous reasons technically called delivery overheads, would slow down the speed of a hack even further from maximum achievable speeds.
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/📁
