Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gratia
Aside from the possibility of identification with a specific person, isn’t it significant that the names themselves were found under the circumstances described?

No.

Regards,

7 posted on 12/26/2019 3:43:36 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek; Gratia

A.B.—

As someone who teaches in the field, I respectfully disagree with your no.

If you are told that nearly everyone in Chicago was Barak, Hasan, Omar, Mohammad and the like, and that the culture of Alphonso, Rocco, and Giuseppe had no connection with the town until later, and that their culture didi not exist until much later, this is a big deal.

Few, if any, of these names could refer directly to relevant Biblical persons, but showing that the cradle of Biblical culture existed as described in terms of name usage and was in contact with Egypt is of great value given the present state of archaeology as it interacts with Biblical Scholarship.

Shanks had managed to do a lot of good work in terms of advancing the fruitful interaction of archaeology and the Bible—esp. given that he was trained as a lawyer. If he thinks that something is worth getting out in front of the public, I’d trust his opinion over that of most others.


8 posted on 12/26/2019 4:34:19 AM PST by Hieronymus ("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, to Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson