Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
And I can see his argument as to why, though Taney went way further than can be supported by a reasonable interpretation of Constitutional intent.

Taney went way further than the matter in front of the court at the time. His meanderings, reasonable and unreasonable, were not germane to the question of Dred Scott's ability to sue in court and were made in dicta.

914 posted on 01/22/2020 11:20:20 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 912 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
Taney went way further than the matter in front of the court at the time. His meanderings, reasonable and unreasonable, were not germane to the question of Dred Scott's ability to sue in court and were made in dicta.

From what I have read, people say he was intent on making a political statement through the power of the court, and that's why he threw everything into it but the kitchen sink.

It just happened to be the case on which he hung all the other stuff that he didn't like over the years.

940 posted on 01/22/2020 3:12:37 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson