Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: OIFVeteran

If he was looking for Supreme Court pronouncements a little closer to the times in question, maybe he should cite Texas v White. 1869.


248 posted on 12/30/2019 8:47:50 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Snipe
If he was looking for Supreme Court pronouncements a little closer to the times in question, maybe he should cite Texas v White. 1869.

The court issued its decision in Texas v. White after the war - it therefore could have no influence on (i.e., was not relevant to) the actions of the seceding States, or those of the federal government (unless you believe the folks of that era had ESP ;>). The opinion was also largely irrelevant, in terms of any effect on States considering secession in the future - the 14th Amendment had already been ratified, and whether intended or not, that amendment appears to prohibit State secession (barring any future amendment with applicable provisions),,,

251 posted on 12/30/2019 10:27:02 AM PST by Who is John Galt? ("He therefore who may resist, must be allowed to strike.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson