The courts interpret the law, that is the way our system was set up. We can disagree with it and try to change it, but it is the law of the land. The right to privacy is the law in our country. Do I think it was applied wrongly to abortion? yes. But your going to get bad interpretations because we are human.
As far as gay marriage goes I think the Supreme Court was wrong because marriage requirements are up to the states, except for race due to the 14th amendment. In that situation though states that had approved same sex marriage through their legislative body(and I think their were five at that point) would have gay marriage the others wouldn’t. However, under the full faith and credit clause other states would have to recognize those marriages.
This is the reason I was always for a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman instead of that defense of marriage act.
Making up fake law is not "interpreting" it. Again, I ask you where in all the congressional laws or constitutional laws is there a law that says States are prohibited from making laws banning abortion?
And by this I mean banning laws that have existed since at least the late 19th century and weren't considered "unconstitutional" until 1973.
Point out the law and I will concede the point.
However, under the full faith and credit clause other states would have to recognize those marriages.
Did this "full faith and credit" require states to recognize other states laws regarding servitude?
Seems like this "full faith and credit" argument is a buffet where Judges just pick what they like, and then force everyone else to eat what they picked rather than what the people themselves might want.