^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
In theory, yes.
But it is never going to happen unless they find a direct, smoking-gun paper trail of bribes; for example a personal check deposited in Obama's bank account, signed by the head if Hezbollah, and with the reference note added: "For services rendered in quashing DEA investigation."
Otherwise no sane President would ever want to set the precedent of prosecuting their predecessor(s) for alleged crimes committed in office.
AWK Dec. 14 News: Republicans fight back hard against [DS] puppets. IG report exposes DEM liars!
Please let me know if you want on or off this ping list.
*
I think it would be funny for the GOP to use the phony house rules to prosecute Pelosi, shift, Corny and such. Arrest and try they 100 at a time.
Lavin says that any past president may be charged , so President trump can go back on Obama, Clinton and Bush?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
In theory, yes.
But it is never going to happen unless they find a direct, smoking-gun paper trail of bribes; for example a personal check deposited in Obama’s bank account, signed by the head if Hezbollah, and with the reference note added: “For services rendered in quashing DEA investigation.”
Otherwise no sane President would ever want to set the precedent of prosecuting their predecessor(s) for alleged crimes committed in office.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I missed or didn’t see what kind of crimes Levin (you did mean Levin, I figure) said past presidents could be charged with. Thus, I am a bit unclear as to what you (Dis) mean by your reply. I doubt you mean that 0b0la, for instance, won’t be charged with any of the many crimes he committed while in office. Amirite or not?