What is your opinion about this?
this is the first time it has come to my attention and right now my time is limited so i can’t really delve into it in any depth. however, i recall the crude liberal journalist email lists from a decade or more ago that this system seems to augment if not replace, helping to explain why all of the MSM news seems so similar (it is at least two generations beyond the fax model). (The fax, in turn, replaced the teletype, which in turn probably replaced the telegraph...) I thought I noticed a reference to the fax model on an FR discussion just a couple of days ago, and the keywords i entered on FR for MOS and ENPS are apparently the first on FR for these topics— so collectively, we on FR need to recognize the white box mechanisms within the MSM for what they are and not waste too much excess energy lamenting their telltale manifestations. Perhaps the more important thing (from the qanon perspective, although who am i to presume to know) is who is in control MOS and eNPS. MOS and eNPS are the mechanism. This mechanism helps enforce unanimity and consistency among the six or so mega-multinationals that are the MSM. It however does help explain why we hear so much of the same old **** so quickly.
For example, some conservative/libertarian information and analysis are immediately labeled “debunked conspiracy theories” even if it concerns breaking news / current events and has never been published before. Therefore MOS and eNPS probably play a big role in quashing conservative/libertarian information and analysis, overwhelming it with MSM originated propaganda.
That is what MOS and eNPS are for, a protocol for the modern multinationalist propaganda machine to disseminate multinationalist propaganda, talking points and disinformation at near light speeds all around the globe.
It’s probably also significant that FR is a collectively self aware entity that has the power to examine, analyze, and when necessary reject MOS- and eNPS disseminated MSM propaganda. We at FR necessarily do not operate at light speed — so that is one unavoidable disadvantage— but I think FR is one of the best anti-propaganda weapons the world has ever known in the ongoing struggle against multinational groupthink. One thing that we can do is help broadcast the existence and use of these mechanisms and protocols, identifying them and their usage for all to see, understand, and compensate for in their everyday lives when confronted with news of political events of the day.
Finally it is a bit scary knowing that there are still many people out there who implicitly trust the MSM news media without giving it any thought as to how easy it would be to control the news narrative with modern technology. The majority of people living today (at least in the USA) are under 50 years old. This means that they have no personal recollection of the JFK assassination and therefore little viable experience with definitive lies being propagated by the MSM, the MIC, and the modern day multinationals. That is a bit scary, but I suppose that the challenge is to find a way to enlighten them before something potentially a lot more scary happens.
(Standard disclaimer: I could be wrong with some or all of the above...)