REPs point out that Nadler did *NOT* have the DEM counsel sworn in ... Nadler says that the counsels are not witnesses so he didn’t have to ... says now they’ll become witnesses so now he will have them take an oath. I hope a REP in questioning asks the guy under oath whether his statement was true to get it under oath.
Biggs makes a point of order, Nadler is angry, “HE WAS NOT A WITNESS!”