BREAKING: John Solomon publishes that IG Report will say FBI's Russiagate investigation "adequately predicated"https://t.co/XvRIGjPXGB pic.twitter.com/uzBkD22SU5— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) December 9, 2019
Posted on 12/06/2019 9:06:00 AM PST by ransomnote
And...out comes the logorrhea.
I think this is faked.
Interesting - the Dem counsel/witness is allowed to be asked questions but the GOP counsel has been excused and cannot take questions.
You Has A Smell...of retread.
BREAKING: John Solomon publishes that IG Report will say FBI's Russiagate investigation "adequately predicated"https://t.co/XvRIGjPXGB pic.twitter.com/uzBkD22SU5— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) December 9, 2019
> And...out comes the logorrhea.
And apparently personal attacks are all that you have.
And here’s Solomon’s article, posted today, clearly POS obiec cherry picked the one teeny part that made Solomon look like a Debbie downer.
IG report lays out compelling evidence FBI misled FISA court in Russia case, sources say
he Justice Department inspector general’s report into the Russia collusion investigation lays out incontrovertible evidence that the FBI misled the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court through false information and omissions, according to sources familiar with its findings.
The evidence that the judges were misled is so sweeping that it could provide grounds, if Attorney General William Barr chooses, to withdraw the FBI’s application for the surveillance warrants that began in October 2016 to target ex-Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, the sources added.
Such a move, while mostly legally symbolic since the probe is long since closed, would still amount to a resounding rebuke to an FBI probe that the bureau, Democrats and their media allies relentlessly defended.
A spokeswoman for the Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment on Monday morning.
“The evidence of false statements, false information, deception through omission is going to raise an important debate about FISA,” one source told me.
The report is expected to conclude the FBI’s decision to open a counterintelligence probe of the Trump campaign’s possible ties to Russia in 2016 was adequately predicated but that its subsequent reliance on the so-called Steele dossier and execution of FISA warrants to assist the probe were problematic.
That reliance became even more troubling in early 2017 when the FBI conducted an interview with one of Christopher Steele’s sources that raised further concerns about the reliability of a dossier that was funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
One question, the sources said, is whether FBI officials with access to the facts failed to adequately divulge issues in the case to those officials who signed the warrant, which was approved Oct 21, 2016 and renewed three times in 2017.
Inspector General Michael Horowitz is slated to release the report midday Monday after briefing certain congressional oversight committees.
As I reported last week, some key revelations to watch:
· Did the FBI withhold exculpatory evidence (proof of innocence) against such investigative targets as Page and fellow Trump campaign staffer George Papadopoulos?
· Did the FBI withhold derogatory information about the reliability and political motives of the former British spy Christopher Steele?
· Did the FBI fail to verify evidence in the Steele dossier before using it as evidence?
· Will there be a criminal referral of an FBI employee suspected of falsifying evidence in the FISA matter?
flash back to code pink disrupting every proceeding imaginable in former years...If he was wearing a p hat, they would have let him stay...
Newbie.
I remember you when you were bigsigh. A debbie downer then and now.
I wonder when we’re going to see the redacted 20 pages of the 4th FISA app.
DECLAS now!
He was posting on the internet before we were all born. That makes him a demigod.
I have several smells. I’m 73.
I admit to being a retired I also explained why I came back again recently. The owner was gracious enough to allow it.
My bio is aug 8, 1998 under biggish. Now I am olesigh. Get it! several long departures many involuntary. But my politics fit the site and the owners statements more than ever.
I just didn’t like little busybodies interfering with serious discussions and trying to play gatekeeper. I know how to issue serious beatdowns, but I am on like double secret probation.
I’m glad to be back and look forward to the impeachment play out and the election campaign.
I think the above solomon tweet is likely not authentic.
***********************************************
Thanks for doing the homework, LJ. I thought it didn’t sound right when I read it.
I want to hear what AG Barr has to say. WHen I read legal and gov documents, I start going dizzy.
> Newbie.
I resemble that remark!
I lurked for a few months coming from a.c-e.c.ww before signing up and jumping in ;)
He was bigsigh and got banned.
I remember him when he was bigsigh. Just like he is now.
Baden spoke about his observation of the autopsy in a press conference. He said that some of the broken bones in the neck were rarely broken in suicides, but often broken in murder.
That justified his fee from the family. He was hired to make sure the autopsy was on the up and up. He made no challenge to the Medical Examiner’s finding of suicide. He did claim not Epstein was murdered.
Hope that helps.
It has to be, I just posted 3 comments about it above.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.