A Weekly Dose of President Trump - Trump Family Train 12/2/19 to 12/31/19.

FReepers, Cult45, and Deplorables | December 2, 2019 | dollyCali

[STARLIT]

When he was around 3, I put Skin So Soft on his legs because he loved to, even then, stay out in the evening hitting a ball. The next morning I rushed him to the doctor because it looked like he had been bitten hundreds of times. The doctor asked me if I had put anything on him..and of course I said yes. Well, I should have taken that as a sign he had problems. He never would eat the cereal one puts babies on (rice) I didn't have a clue what the problem was. In the first grade he would come home from school and throw up in our drive way coming off the school bus. That was every day.

I found a doctor who would test him for allergies..wasn't easy. Powerade has corn syrup in it and its a hit with kids at ball parks.

[sweetiepiezer]

My Donald gets better looking every day.
MAGA

[RightGeek]

[exit82]

[djstex]

I've been on the phone with my mom discussing all the latest...and whoa behold Hannity Show...Butt-ride getting caned by his own in his rally! LOL!

[sissyjane]

No thanks.

[STARLIT]

LIVE Breaking News ‏

DEVELOPING: Mandatory evacuations for those within a 4-mile radius of Texas chemical plant remain in place.

DEVELOPING: Mandatory evacuations for those within a 4-mile radius of Texas chemical plant remain in place https://t.co/66FElZLPeO— LIVE Breaking News (@NewsBreaking) November 27, 2019

[sissyjane]

God bless you Weston! Prayers from me for you and your medical team.

[sweetiepiezer]

John Solomon

Horowitz report will be a big deal!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsTzSiAiJp0#action=share

[Vlad The Inhaler]

The Social Security Administration keeps track of baby names in the United States. In 2018, Muhammad was #345, Mohammad was #605, Mohammed was #627.

Good find.

That's still far too many muslims flooding the country.

Those three names are really just spelling variations of the pedophile generally known as Muhammad.

I wonder where the name would rank if the three were rolled into one.

It's hard to think of any major social or economic problem facing the country that hasn't been caused by or exacerbated by federal government politicians.

.

[exit82]

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

· 1m

Where’s the Fake Whistleblower? Where’s Whistleblower number 2? Where’s the phony informer who got it all wrong?

[exit82]

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

· 8m

The story today that we are sending 12,000 troops to Saudi Arabia is false or, to put it more accurately, Fake News!

[exit82]

Rudy Giuliani

@RudyGiuliani

· 1m

The Accounts Chamber in Ukraine found an alleged misuse of $5.3B in U.S. funds during the Obama administration while Biden was “Point Man.”

Obama embassy urged Ukrainian police NOT to investigate!

Stay tuned to find out why.

[hoosiermama]

Have a molasses cookie recipe that makes a small ginger snap. Ifs in refrigerator will be ready to bake in AM.
Also a chocolate mint snow cookie
And RUSSIAN tea cookie

Got most of the chip candies done today
1Covered pretzels
2Peppermint bark
3Chocolate Fudge Liberal (with nuts)
4Conservative (without nuts)

Also did the green butter press tree cookie
May try a red/white peppermint press cookie tomorrow. Maybe a half batch. So if it doesn’t work there no major loss.

Hanging up the apron for the night!

Found out the dead battery was original with the 2005 truck. Suppose to last 7 years. Pushing 15. While it was going in got some items I’d forgotten to get earlier in week.

[STARLIT]

Roscoe B. Davis... I stand by my opinion they used an NSL to get these records.

Two contentious aspects of NSLs are the nondisclosure provision and judicial oversight when the FBI issues an NSL. When the Director of the FBI (or his designee) authorizes the inclusion of a nondisclosure provision in an NSL, the recipient may face criminal prosecution.

The purpose of a nondisclosure provision is to prevent the recipient of an NSL from compromising both the current FBI investigation involving a specific person as well as future investigations, either of which could fetter the Government's efforts to address threats to NAT SEC.

But see that's the crux of this, where is the National Security threat? They have to be able to justify that if it's properly challenged.

Like ALL other administrative subpoenas, NSLs do not require judicial approval. For NSLs, that is because the U.S. Supreme Court has held the types of information the FBI obtains with NSLs provide no constitutionally protected reasonable expectation of privacy under the PPA

Congressional Subpoenas rules empower all its standing committees with the authority to compel witnesses to produce testimony & documents for subjects under its jurisdiction. In fact, legal rights associated with a judicial subpoena do not apply to a Congressional subpoena.

In other words, congress can't subpoena a private citizen or a private entity to turn over documents of a customer, they have to get a judge. It's pretty simple.

Lawfareblog and the Wittes crew are full of shit.

Chapter 85 of title 28, US Code, Sec. 1365a. "Congressional actions against subpoena recipients"

"The action shall be filed in a United States district court of competent jurisdiction. It shall be the duty of the US district courts"

[sweetiepiezer]

Saw Long faced John on tv today talking about going to Iowa with Joe.
My goodness his tongue goes in and out more than it ever did. Yuk!

[STARLIT]

We had to have two faucets replaced yesterday and the pipes under the sink. They were 32 years old...lol The plumber laughed and said he was surprised at how long they worked.

[sweetiepiezer]

Speaking of O. J.......

https://www.tmz.com/2019/12/05/o-j-simpson-dancing-bar-las-vegas-video/

[exit82]

Two more Federal judges confirmed today, bringing the total to 8 for this week.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Donald_Trump

“As of December 5, 2019, the United States Senate has confirmed 172 Article III judges nominated by President Trump, including 2 Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 48 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, 120 judges for the United States District Courts, and 2 judges for the United States Court of International Trade.[2] There are currently 48 nominations to Article III courts awaiting Senate action, including 4 for the Courts of Appeals, 43 for the District Courts and 1 for the Court of International Trade.[3] There is currently 1 vacancy on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 79 vacancies on the U.S. District Courts, 2 vacancies on the U.S. Court of International Trade,[3] and 16 announced federal judicial vacancies that will occur before the end of Trump’s first term (3 for the Courts of Appeals and 13 for District Courts).[4] Trump has not made any recess appointments to the federal courts.

In terms of Article I courts, as of December 5, 2019, the Senate has confirmed 13 judges nominated by Trump, including 3 for the United States Court of Federal Claims, 4 for the United States Tax Court, 4 for the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, 1 for the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and 1 for the United States Court of Military Commission Review. There are currently 13 nominations to Article I courts awaiting Senate action, including 7 for the United States Court of Federal Claims and 4 for the Tax Court and 2 for the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. There are currently 8 vacancies on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, 2 on the U.S. Tax Court, 0 on the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, 0 on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Services, and 0 on the U.S. Court of Military Commission Review. Trump designated Susan G. Braden and Margaret M. Sweeney as chief judges of the Court of Federal Claims.

In terms of Article IV territorial courts, as of June 12, 2019, Trump has not made any appointments or elevated any judges to the position of chief judge. There is currently 1 nomination to an Article IV court awaiting Senate action.”

[Rusty0604]

😎