I do also, as long as the hair and head above it are our First Lady's!
I hate censorship, dammit, and there are certain discussion I find objectionable...and I ignore those. I'm pretty sure there are some here who do not appreciate my f'n frank style and bluntness...but that's ok. Everyone gets a say...mostly. What annoys me is that I have to go sneaking around to ask some kind Freeq to send me the link for 8kun...you know, that place we're not supposed to talk about? Thank goodness that info is not in New York Times article, right?
>>What annoys me is that I have to go sneaking around to ask some kind Freeq to send me the link for 8kun
Think of it as more simple kindness to another human being. Or maybe think of it as personal survival for what you find fun. This site being sued can take down all the fun really fast. So it’s in our best interests to take an extreme position on making sure it ISN’T sued so it stays viable as a place we can enthuse and complain.
Every one of us has a completely disjoint set of what we tolerate and what we enjoy and what we abhor. I have a definite problem with animal cruelty. I won’t contribute to animal charities that try to encourage me with pictures of horror. And if I had to scroll past too many pictures of animal cruelty, I’d think about being elsewhere. Daily Mail causes me a lot of trouble, but there’s also great visual rewards there. Torn.
Sometimes you constrain yourself because you don’t like to hurt another specific person whom you know objects to something. Sometimes you’re not up for a philosophy fight. (Hi, Baggie!) But if we get along 40 percent of the time, I’d think we were doing something really special. And think of the exercise your scrolling finger gets! Healthiest finger on your hand.