https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3796192/posts?page=1
Howie Carr: ICE is cool with me, and should be for anyone tired of illegal immigration
Boston Herald ^ | November 23, 2019 | Howie Carr
Posted on 11/24/2019, 11:09:20 AM by billorites
God bless ICE — Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
“There should be more pro-ICE demonstrations like the one Saturday in Burlington. ICE agents are part of the thin blue line, which is getting thinner all the time in Massachusetts, already a sanctuary state in fact if not quite in law.
A sanctuary for them — lawless immigrant criminals — but a place increasingly fraught with peril for their prey — hard-working American citizens and legal aliens.
Look at the ongoing murder trial in Boston of Bampumim Teixeira, charged with the horrific 2017 murder in Andrew Square of two beloved anesthesiologists, both of whom happened to be legal immigrants.
What’s seldom mentioned about this brutal crime, because it doesn’t fit the woke orthodoxy about illegal immigration, is that if Teixeira had been an American, those two doctors would be alive today.
Teixeira had violently robbed two banks in downtown Boston, and should have been doing a lengthy stretch in federal prison. But if he’d been convicted on serious charges (the way an American would have been) he’d have been deported afterwards.
None of the clueless Social Justice Warrior crackpots at the courthouse — public defenders, prosecutors or judges — wanted this violent foreign (and homeless) thug to be returned to the Third World hellhole where he belonged.”...
I know you got this from another post here at FR. Thanks for including your source, it made it easier for me to find the copyright info.
Watch for next post concerning "fair use".
Media News Groups (where this article is posted)
4. Intellectual Property Rights
All information, data, and content displayed on, transmitted through or used in connection with MediaNews Group, dba Digital First Media, sites, including, but not limited to, news articles, reviews, directories, guides, text, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips, video, html, source and object code, trademarks, logos and the like, as well as its selection and arrangement (together, the “Content”), is owned by Digital First Media and its affiliated companies or the third party credited as the owner of the Content. All Content is provided for informational purposes only and you are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy, completeness, and applicability of all Content and for your use of any Content. You may use the Content online only, and solely for your personal, non-commercial use.
If you operate a web site and wish to link to any of the sites owned and operated by Digital First Media, you may do so provided you agree to cease such link upon request from Digital First Media and that you do not state or imply any sponsorship of your site by Digital First Media (for example, by using our stylized trademark or logo).
No other use is permitted without prior written permission of MediaNews Group, dba Digital First Media,. The permitted use described in this paragraph is contingent on your compliance at all times with the Terms of Use. You may not, for example, republish any portion of the Content on any internet, intranet or extranet site or incorporate the Content in any database, compilation, archive or cache. You may not distribute any Content to others, whether or not for payment or other consideration, and you may not modify, copy, frame, cache, reproduce, sell, publish, transmit, display or otherwise use any portion of the Content. You may not scrape or otherwise copy our Content without written permission. You agree not to decompile, reverse engineer or disassemble any software or other products or processes accessible through the Platform, or insert any code or product or manipulate the Content of MediaNews Group, dba Digital First Media, or the Platform in ser’s experience, and not to use aHnyodmatea mining, data gathering or extraction (https://www.medianewsgroup.com/) In certain cases, you may be able to obtain a license to use individual stories that appear on the Platform or affiliated Platform through online functionality we have specifically designated. For example, email a story to (https://www.medianewsgroup.com/) a friend or purchase a photograph.
MediaNews Group, dba Digital First Media, and its licensors retain all right, title, and interest, including, Adtaxi (http://www.adtaxi.com/) without limitation, all intellectual property rights, proprietary rights, rights of publicity, rights of privacy, and anyandallotherlegalrightsprotectingdata,information
FAIR USE:
Sorry for the wall of text, but it’s necessary.
(From the Copyright Office..the big dogs :) )
Really quick tip: Post the link of the article, then post a paragraph or two from the article. Be safe, don’t make FR sorry.
More Information on Fair Use
Search Cases
Index last updated September 2019
Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. Section 107 calls for consideration of the following four factors in evaluating a question of fair use:
Purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes: Courts look at how the party claiming fair use is using the copyrighted work, and are more likely to find that nonprofit educational and noncommercial uses are fair. This does not mean, however, that all nonprofit education and noncommercial uses are fair and all commercial uses are not fair; instead, courts will balance the purpose and character of the use against the other factors below. Additionally, “transformative” uses are more likely to be considered fair. Transformative uses are those that add something new, with a further purpose or different character, and do not substitute for the original use of the work.
Nature of the copyrighted work: This factor analyzes the degree to which the work that was used relates to copyright’s purpose of encouraging creative expression. Thus, using a more creative or imaginative work (such as a novel, movie, or song) is less likely to support a claim of a fair use than using a factual work (such as a technical article or news item). In addition, use of an unpublished work is less likely to be considered fair.
Amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole: Under this factor, courts look at both the quantity and quality of the copyrighted material that was used. If the use includes a large portion of the copyrighted work, fair use is less likely to be found; if the use employs only a small amount of copyrighted material, fair use is more likely. That said, some courts have found use of an entire work to be fair under certain circumstances. And in other contexts, using even a small amount of a copyrighted work was determined not to be fair because the selection was an important part—or the “heart”—of the work.
Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: Here, courts review whether, and to what extent, the unlicensed use harms the existing or future market for the copyright owner’s original work. In assessing this factor, courts consider whether the use is hurting the current market for the original work (for example, by displacing sales of the original) and/or whether the use could cause substantial harm if it were to become widespread.
In addition to the above, other factors may also be considered by a court in weighing a fair use question, depending upon the circumstances. Courts evaluate fair use claims on a case-by-case basis, and the outcome of any given case depends on a fact-specific inquiry. This means that there is no formula to ensure that a predetermined percentage or amount of a work—or specific number of words, lines, pages, copies—may be used without permission.
Please note that the Copyright Office is unable to provide specific legal advice to individual members of the public about questions of fair use. See 37 C.F.R. 201.2(a)(3).
Are they crazy, criminal, or stupid?
Oh wait, I forgot corrupt....probably getting money from Soros.