It is a rather long read (so says they guy that actually read Bugliosi's book), so I may go back and finish it.
Believe me for over 40 years I was 100% convinced that Oswald was a patsy, so to revisit this would take some pretty damn good evidence.
No problem. I understand fully about not wanting to read something when I just want them to get to the point.
It is a rather long read (so says they guy that actually read Bugliosi's book), so I may go back and finish it.
Yes, it is a rather long read, and I have to admit I didn't finish it. I read just enough to convince myself that there may actually be something to this theory.
When I started, I thought it was just more nonsense, but after learning some details of information I had never previously heard, I now put this theory into the plausible category.