Curiously... the article mentions that the Vegas shooter handled the ammo with gloves when he picked it up and only Haigs fingerprints showed up.
If the plan was a suicide hit - why cover up your fingerprints?
posted on 11/19/2019 3:04:31 PM PST
[If the plan was a suicide hit - why cover up your fingerprints?]
It would not be surprising if he vacillated between suicide mission vs shoot and scoot. People go back and forth on buying different toaster oven brands, so it’s understandable he tried to leave the option of getting away somewhat open.
posted on 11/19/2019 3:24:06 PM PST
by Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
“If the plan was a suicide hit - why cover up your fingerprints?”
Careful, your critical thinking skills are showing.
posted on 11/19/2019 3:35:59 PM PST
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
"why cover up your fingerprints"
because there is not one piece of physical evidence that was Paddock's body on the ground. There is not one piece of physical evidence Paddock fired a single round that day.
Lots of circumstantial evidence but no hard evidence that ties the body to Paddock.
posted on 11/19/2019 3:56:19 PM PST
by Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
Because it was not a suicide-hit. It was a muslim battle plan designed to promote a call for firearms confiscation.
posted on 11/19/2019 4:03:42 PM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson