“She was already a sympathetic witness & the President’s tweet ripping her allowed Schiff to point it out real time characterizing it as witness tampering or intimidation -adding an article of impeachment real-time,”
/////////////////////
wit·ness
noun: witness;1.a person who sees an event, typically a crime or accident, take place.
The logic here escapes me. Does Baer actually think people are watching this to determine guilt on a non existent crime. Three witnesses in two days. None ever met the President or heard the phone call that we already have a transcript of the entire content.
She lied saying the Ukrainian political establishment wasn’t anti-Trump before the 2016 election.
But she also made a big error saying it was in the U. S. national interest to fight corruption in ukraine. The citizens there elect an anti-corruption slate of candidate.
What’s their first target? Burisma.
What does that company do? Hires Hunter Biden.
Instead of kissing her ass, someone should have asked: Was this action of going on the board a problem for U. S. policy if our stated goal was to fight corruption making the son of our Vice President part of it?
Nobody asked her for that fairly obvious question.