"Where did the diver come from?"
THAT ISN'T A DIVER, IT'S FUDDY'S TROUSER AND SHOE.
It doesn't require the Navy and billions of dollars in resources, to kill an obese woman with arrhythmia at the scene of a crash landing on choppy water. Like her deputy said, she simply stopped breathing.
Greetings, FRiend!!
An arrhythmia is only conjectured to have occurred to "Fuddy," despite there being no physical evidence of its occurrence, and no previous doctor's notes that she ever had a heart problem, to which her brother Lewis attested when he was initially told how she died.
As far as your claimed "choppy waters," you may know that the passenger who was a former Green Beret described going into the water as if it was like "stepping into a swimming pool." (See glassy water beyond the camera, below.) As these pictures confirm, it was only after-the-fact lies that tried to paint a different narrative, that supposedly would have contributed to hyperventilation on "Fuddy's" part.
That particular submarine stationed off Kalaupapa's waters, the USS La Jolla, was known via FOIA to have been assigned off-shore of that very area, beginning only hours before the Fuddy Hoax started. It was one of just a few US Navy Submarines in inventory (at the time) that had the requisite equipment, that is, a Dry Deck Shelter and detachable SEAL delivery vehicle. Such a vehicle was captured both in one or more photographs and in radio communications within the first 15-30 minutes of the event's start. Imagine that! What a coincidence!
Only the name of that particular submarine was not claimed by the USNavy to be classified, even years after the event. Other unique, classified Navy gear appears--presumably inadvertently--in the passenger videographer's edited video stream. The videographer strongly implied he recorded one continuous stream with his camera, but a number of deceptive edits were proved to have been made, apparently to conceal certain clandestine activities.
The La Jolla's having been assigned to the CIA that day implies Director Brennan was both directly involved with its plans that day. He would have had to physically sign off on its activities that day. But with the evidence of the NTSB, for example, undertaking to falsify evidence, we know that doesn't just happen because a single government employee gets a wild burr under his saddle. It belies the cross-coordination of many agencies. Evidence for that cross-coordination is borne out with evidence that is now in the possession of non-Deep State government "white hats."
Our evidence--contained in published book--has now been vetted by several high-ranking people and has been deemed to show a pervasive fraud that was committed that day and in a coordinated, subsequent cover-up.
So Fred, your logic doesn't suggest it's appropriate to pooh-pooh that there were military divers on scene, despite that I might agree that it's possible to kill with someone with even something so simple as heart-attack poison in a small scratch. By your way of thinking, must all murders therefore have been committed as simply as you might wish it to have been?
In this case, we know the so-called "Loretta Fuddy" didn't die that day, but rather merely was whisked away to Valhalla, where all good spooks are proverbially allowed to retire.