Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

This is a truly dumb article. One doesn’t divide their nest-egg value by one’s final/highest annual salary to determine how long one’s nest-egg will be viable. One accounts for some level of annual nest-egg value growth, and then deducts expected annual/monthly expenses, adding inflation into the future expenses. So, if you have a $1M nest-egg growing at 8% per year, and have $60K annual withdrawals/costs and also account for a 2% annual increase/inflation on those costs over time, that $1M GROWS FOREVER! (Just be mindful of any Required Minimum Distributions).


31 posted on 10/29/2019 9:00:29 AM PDT by hollywood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hollywood

You win

It’s a stupid article


63 posted on 10/29/2019 9:44:31 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: hollywood
Just don't go to Vegas and gamble away the "Nest Egg"

“Don’t use that word, it’s off-limits to you. Only those in this house who understand it might use it. And don’t use any part of it either. Don’t use nest, don’t use egg. You’re out in the forest, you can point. The bird lives in a round stick. And you have ‘things’ over easy with toast.”

93 posted on 10/29/2019 12:19:16 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson