Image below of text on the bottom of page 8 of The Finders document release.
Since this information was not acted upon, I assumed that this "Assistant United States Attorny for the District of Columbia helped bury it and may have been rewarded for it, or at least continued to rise in the realms as this person seems to have "played along." I wondered (and wonder still) if any of the current players in D.C. swamp we're aware of served in this capacity in 1987.
I know there are hundreds of attorneys but thought this KIND of person (plays satanic cover up games) would still be around. I have only begun looking so, as I said, I don't know the answer, but I did come across someone who makes me wonder if he's "that kind" of person.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Bates
He was appointed to positions, including FISA court (ending 2014) by Judge Roberts and later by George Bush. He was promoted in 1987:
"He served as an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia from 1980 to 1987, and was Chief of the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office from 1987 to 1997. "
And there's this: " Bates worked as Deputy Independent Counsel for Kenneth Starr and the Independent Counsel's office during the investigation into President Bill Clinton."
Note that Bates ruled against TRUMP twice, and authorized NSA mass collection of data while on FISC:
Notable rulings[edit]
- On August 3, 2018 Judge Bates ruled that "the Trump administration did not justify its decision to eliminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, also known as DACA" and ordered DACA to be reinstated. He gave the administration 20 days to appeal.[7][8]
- On April 24, 2018, Judge Bates ruled that the Trump administration must resume accepting new applications for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) but stayed his decision for 90 days to allow the Department of Homeland Security to explain why DACA was being canceled.[9]
- In November 2013, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declassified and released a circa-July 2010 (date classified) FISC ruling by Judge Bates authorizing the National Security Agency to restart mass collection of internet metadata, including those of U.S. citizens.[13] Bates noted that the NSA had been violating provisions of various laws, but nevertheless decided to allow the government to continue many aspects of the mass surveillance program. Critics of encroaching U.S. security state policies, in a nod to the Bates numbering method used in the legal field, appropriated the "Bates stamp" moniker as a neologism to refer to often uncritical FISC scrutiny of U.S. government conduct when considering Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications.[14]