No.
I have an obligation to stop fools from putting troops into wars with stupid rules of engagement.
An appropriate analogy for you would be if some bureaucratic agency mandated building bridges without using welding equipment, but the people who build the bridges would be personally liable if the bridges fail.
Obviously thats an imperfect analogy, since the bridge builders would not be dead. And since the bridge isn’t being built in the middle east or in Asia or in central america.
It has nothing to do with nobility and everything to do with having the methodology be actually capable of achieving something both worthwhile and desirable while also minimizing the cost in American lives.
- I have an obligation to stop fools from putting troops into wars with stupid rules of engagement.
You fought so I have the right to share my opinion on this forum, fool. So how about you put your big-boy pants on and stop shrieking like a Liberal.
I am not putting troops in wars. There was no fighting there.
Ironworking is a dangerous occupation.
So is policing and fire fighting.
I never knew anyone freely signing up with the US military to fight wars at home.
At least others tried to make an argument, even as disgracefully as: I don’t care about stabbing an ally in the back.”
All you did was invent an insult out of total Liberal stupidity (”you fight wars”)
That’s an obligation?
Sorry about your PTSD.
Sorry you got PTSD serving in war where we lost 383 soldiers killed.