Replies

While I continue to believe RR is a black hat, I don’t have evidence for my current theory as to the “why” he was hired when he was.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Dear Fearless Leader,

If that is your only open question, maybe you can answer a few others:

1) Why was "Black hat" RR instrumental in firing Comey, the BIGGEST anti-derp BOOM to date?

2) Why was "Black hat" RR instrumental in removing the insidious and evil McCabe from control of the "Insurance policy" investigation, by setting up the "Inept" Mueller SC?

3) Why did "Black hat" RR get involved in 4th FISA, unless it was to insert the "Smoking gun" assurances and oaths of cabal participants and possibly FVEY into the still-redacted 20 pages? (Admittedly, this is a "Dis" interpretation, yet to be verified.)

4) Why did "Black hat" RR keep the "Inept" Mueller and his "Angry Democrats" away from issues better left to the Barr/Durham/Huber DoJ? (Hint: Wouldn't want to inadvertently inoculate the RATS!)

5) Why did "Black hat" RR's "Mueller gambit" pay off so well for POTUS, keeping the RAT media transfixed for 2 years while he fixed the military, the SCOTUS, the Senate, NAFTA, PPT, Paris, taxes and began building the Wall--ALL ENSURING 2020 re-election?

6) Why did "Black hat" RR become an ESSENTIAL INGREDIENT in the Barr analysis of "NO OBSTRUCTION" burying part II of the Mueller report?

MY CONCLUSION:

"White Hat" RR is at or near GROUND ZERO of the Plan.

Dear Fearless Leader,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Eh...I prefer MOD or even ‘r’ as those are short not as “fearless” or “leaderish”....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If that is your only open question, maybe you can answer a few others:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Huh? I didn’t say I had all the answers and only one open question remained. I have said I view his his overall actions (i.e., blockade) as more substantial than other details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1) Why was “Black hat” RR instrumental in firing Comey, the BIGGEST anti-derp BOOM to date?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I dunno but I suspect he was an “instrument” (POTUS utilized him). I don’t believe there was only one way to remove Comey, but this way was utilized as it provided ideal optics (not driven by Trump himself).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2) Why was “Black hat” RR instrumental in removing the insidious and evil McCabe from control of the “Insurance policy” investigation, by setting up the “Inept” Mueller SC?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mueller was “inept” because he was the front man to a team of DS working behind him to bring down the president and they couldn’t find anything, or manufacture something in time, to get the job done. They did indict people and the left is waving those indictments around while claiming POTUS is immersed in a sea of corrupt indicted peeps because he himself is corrupt.

Cohen’s indictment still has some on the left referring to POTUS as the “unindicted co-conspirator” mentioned in that trial. No, I don’t believe POTUS would use this 2 years of “framing” smear job against himself to “help” his cause.

Again - I think RR was utilized. With all the crimes Comey and McCabe committed, there must be more than one way to take them down. Ideally, it should e done by those of whom the DS approves so the DS won’t call government to a screeching halt (e.g., the left and DS are currently trying to have Barr’s law license revoked because he supports POTUS, they claim he is merely doing POTUS’s bidding).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3) Why did “Black hat” RR get involved in 4th FISA, unless it was to insert the “Smoking gun” assurances and oaths of cabal participants and possibly FVEY into the still-redacted 20 pages? (Admittedly, this is a “Dis” interpretation, yet to be verified.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Personally I don’t think RR can sign fraudulent FISA’s (posed to bring down a president) to try to entrap others. I don’t think it’s legal and the optics would be horrible. The Deep State on both sides of the aisle is real and needs to be exposed - but making it look like white hats had to lead Dems by the nose to “get them” to do dirty deeds (RR, Mueller leading the witch hunt) would fail horribly in my opinion.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
5) Why did “Black hat” RR’s “Mueller gambit” pay off so well for POTUS, keeping the RAT media transfixed for 2 years while he fixed the military, the SCOTUS, the Senate, NAFTA, PPT, Paris, taxes and began building the Wall—ALL ENSURING 2020 re-election?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I do believe POTUS could find plenty to do while “fixing” the military, the SCOTUS, the senate, NAFTQA, PPT, Paris, texes, the wall.....that would not divide the country and tarnish his brand for 2 years. Posing a sham trial against himself as a distraction only later to admit later those sham leaders (Muller and Rosenstein) were his white hats would NOT win him the election. The country is exhausted and they would feel lied to and manipulated by POTUS. They actually aren’t sure whom to believe. The public would have a hard time believing anything else POTUS said about the Deep State after he cried wolf for political means (witch hunt) for two years.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
6) Why did “Black hat” RR become an ESSENTIAL INGREDIENT in the Barr analysis of “NO OBSTRUCTION” burying part II of the Mueller report?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Personally I thought RR was more of a CATATONIC INGREDIENT in the Barr analysis (thinking of that presser?). I believe that POTUS and the Q team provided RR with sufficient incentive to straighten up and fly right. So he would have been in a position and neutral party to supporting Barr’s analysis if he had played it legit. But he was flipped (IMHO) easily and early and “selected Mueller” who was a front for a hit team Weisman (sp?). The witch hunt was ongoing until Barr stepped in and looked at the evidence, and asked them painful questions about it (Remember Q drop 2776?). Barr stopped what RR and Mueller were doing.

So, we disagree. :)