No, I don’t believe she fits the definition of a CIA Analyst specializing in Ukraine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_M._Gordon
Helps to read the profile of who you think the leaker is.
Also everyone is referring to male pronoun terms.
One thing I read, ( could just be more speculation) is that Gordon wrote the complaint on behalf of the CIA guy. Whoever wrote that is well-versed with the nuances of the law. Typical of a career, commie bureaucrat.
She was CIA and a lot of other things. And we know the conflict that has been ongoing against the Trump presidency boils down to a war between the NSA and the CIA rogue globalist group where globalist means central banker networks. Snowden was a CIA plant inside the NSA. Globalist connected persons tried to make him some sort of folk hero, made a movie about him. But in reality he’s a traitor.
But how is it that people were led to believe that he’s some sort of hero?
We read stuff and we think it’s information, real info. If it comes from the Trump Admin, we believe it because we’ve seen the transparency and honesty over and over again. We trust info coming from the Trump Admin.
But if it comes from another source, especially the CIA and its tech minions such as Google, we should be aware enough by now to give such info pause.
So who gave you and everyone else the info that the whistle blower is a CIA Ukraine analyst?
Either the lawyers for the deep state ‘resistance’ put that out or it was strategically put out as disinformation. It was also hinted the whistleblower was male. None of what is said outside the Trump sphere should be accepted without challenge. These are RUMORS, not facts. And these rumors can often be disinformation coming from either side because both sides are fighting and disinformation can be a powerful tactical weapon.
You should not be in the middle giving weight to any of it but if it’s coming from the Trump Admin DIRECTLY, then you can safely judge the info to be factual because of trust and credibility.
Look at what you posted:
“Also everyone is referring to male pronoun terms.”
Who is ***everyone***?
Do you understand what disinformation is and why it’s used?
Would it benefit the whistleblower-resistance side if disinformation could send the Trump base scurrying in all sorts of directions checking out all sorts of rabbit holes that have nothing to do with the real information?
It’s called distraction. And they use it all the time. It’s standard operating procedure followed by secret squirrels connected to the CIA.
Remember the letter that was written in the NY Times from the anonymous insider who professed to be part of the resistance?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html
Yeah, Sue Gordon is believed to be the author of that letter as well. It’s not a rumor and it’s not an established fact. But EVIDENCE so far points in that direction.
Back to the whistleblower, The whistleblower is putting out weeds as if they are written by Adam Schiff.
The Whistleblower is said to be this and said to be that. Maybe, maybe not.
John Ratcliffe (R-Tx) lays it all out. Watch his statements in the House Intel hearing today (CSPAN). The whistleblower report is completely wrong, Don’t believe a word of it and don’t believe what “everyone” is referring.
The thing that makes Sue Gordon look like the whistleblower is her position, her sudden departure, and most importantly who she is connected with. I’ll give you the person she is close to, Epstein. That’s not even a guess, it’s documented by official connections.
There’s a lot more, but later ....
Interesting WIKI profile. She’s really homely...looks like a bull dyke. Played Women’s Basketball at Duke. Very Close to Brennan. A Trump hater.